Friday, January 13, 2023
HomeHealth NewsCreating for FedRAMP Pays Again

Creating for FedRAMP Pays Again

Getting an utility or service safety licensed below FedRAMP – the Federal Threat and Authorization Administration Program – is likely one of the hardest hurdles dev and ops groups can clear.

It’s so exhausting, that of all of the enterprise providers that exist on this planet, solely 276 are FedRAMP licensed. However these are the apps that the U.S. authorities businesses (just like the Departments of Justice, Commerce, and Schooling, and even some Division of Protection businesses) can use, so constructing an app to this normal could be profitable. The U.S. Authorities is usually a priceless buyer.

It’s tough to take care of FedRAMP compliance when constructing a SaaS product, however making a DevOps course of on your dev and SRE (ops) groups collectively that enables them to stretch to FedRAMP could be value it. Sustaining FedRAMP compliance means creating merchandise with the best safety specs. The safety requirements of FedRAMP additionally embody different stable safety requirements from NIST (Nationwide Institute of Requirements and Expertise) and FISMA (Federal Info Safety Modernization).

A handful of Cisco merchandise meet FedRAMP necessities and are listed within the FedRAMP catalog: Cisco WebEx, Cisco WebEx for Authorities, Cisco Unified Communications Supervisor Cloud for Authorities (Cisco UCM Cloud for Authorities), and Cisco Cloud Lock for Authorities. Different merchandise are within the audit course of.

To get a way of what it takes to satisfy the FedRAMP normal and the advantages and alternatives that come from incomes a FedRAMP ATO (Authorization to Function), I sat down with Charles Randall, a former teammate of mine and a safety professional at Cisco:

What was the largest problem your operations staff wanted to satisfy with FedRAMP?

Charles Randall: Our greatest problem was container vulnerability remediation, which was solely added to scope by the FedRAMP administration workplace the month our audit was scheduled. It was an unlimited change that pulled numerous open supply initiatives into scope, and even required some architectural adjustments. We’re nonetheless struggling to cope with the implications right now.

How would you describe the distinction in your utility and operations safety posture earlier than and after beginning the FedRAMP certification course of?

CR: We began with a stable utility safety posture; adequate to cross ISO 27001/17 and SOC 2 requirements. FedRAMP calls for a considerably greater degree of operational safety, each technically and procedurally. Most of the safety enhancements we made to attain FedRAMP compliance had been utilized to our business operations environments as effectively, making certain world-class safety for our clients and constant processes and procedures throughout groups.

What are the important thing components vital for sustaining a strong ongoing monitoring technique? Would these methods make sense in a non-FedRAMP context?

CR: The important thing components of a strong monitoring program are completeness of imaginative and prescient and a stable set of KPIs. Completeness of imaginative and prescient contains full compliance and vulnerability scanning throughout your complete asset stock, in addition to monitoring of utility, system and community actions with a give attention to anomaly detection. These methods additionally make sense in non-FedRAMP context and had been almost universally utilized to our business working environments.

Do you utilize off-the-shelf instruments to distinguish a safety occasion from a safety incident? Would you utilize these instruments and method if qualifying for FedRAMP wasn’t the target?

CR: We’re primarily utilizing free open supply software program for safety occasion administration, complimented by the total suite of AWS safety providers. Whereas we do anticipate rising adoption of machine studying, there’s actually no substitute for the experience of operators and analysts with eyes on logs, constantly refining monitoring to attain the best potential sign to noise ratio. That is one other case the place we use the identical tooling throughout FedRAMP and non-FedRAMP environments, as a result of it permits us to re-use the FedRAMP work in our business environments, and preserve consistency between working environments.

How do FedRAMP necessities have an effect on utility builders? Does their safety posture enhance as a part of the audit course of?

CR: FedRAMP necessities have an unlimited influence on utility improvement, in any respect ranges. Each determination, from system structure, to third-party part choice, all the way in which all the way down to your selection of cryptographic ciphers, can have vital penalties whereas pursuing or sustaining FedRAMP authorization. Past technical selections, FedRAMP controls additionally require mature software program improvement processes and configuration administration practices, with many necessities extending all the way in which to construct/deploy pipeline and developer laptops.

What are the implications of builders not adopting safety finest practices early within the worth stream (as a part of their every day work)?

Failing to undertake safety finest practices early in your product improvement cycle, or failing to combine these practices into every day routines, may very well be disastrous, no matter whether or not your group is trying to pursue FedRAMP authorization. It’s well-known that the price of fixing software program defects could be an order of magnitude greater or extra in manufacturing versus improvement part of the SDLC. Whereas that’s painful sufficient, once you issue within the potential prices of larger-scale redesigns that is likely to be required because of safety defects, the prices of safety incidents, and the doubtless catastrophic prices of a safety breach, the selection turns into clear that addressing safety calls for early and integrating it into everybody’s every day routine is the most suitable choice. If that argument nonetheless isn’t sufficient to influence you, take into account that person information privateness laws are actually more and more enforced, and infrequently with huge fines.

What would you suggest for builders who’re new to safe coding and wish to rise up to hurry with finest practices. Would you suggest coaching? Studying and adopting safety particular instruments?

All the above. Safe coding is simply….. coding.


Now learn:


We’d love to listen to what you suppose. Ask a query or go away a remark under.
And keep related with Cisco DevNet on social!

LinkedIn | Twitter @CiscoDevNet | Fb | YouTube Channel




Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments